The news spread rapidly this weekend: China was conducting a massive internet crackdown to suppress online “rumors” of political unrest within China’s Communist Party, including posts that military vehicles had entered the streets of Beijing. As described by the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and the BBC, to name a few, China’s latest censorship attempt involved temporarily preventing the nation’s hundreds of millions of internet users from being able to post comments on the nation’s two largest “Twitter-like” microblogging operators, Sina Corp. and Tencent Holdings Ltd. In addition, a reported six people were detained and sixteen websites were shutdown as part of the crackdown effort.
Why such a drastic move? As the Director of a Chinese media website told the Detroit Free Press, the crackdown was intended to “send a signal to the Internet companies and users that the government is watching you.” More specifically, the censorship and detentions apparently intended to quell rumors of a coup, sparked by the sudden removal of Bo Xilai, a high-profile Chinese official who was, until recently, favored to join the top echelon of Chinese political power. As reported by Time, however, “Bo’s rise was derailed last month when a key deputy, former police chief and Chongqing vice mayor Wang Lijun, made a surprise visit to a U.S. consulate. Wang spent an evening at the consulate and was then detained by state security officers upon leaving. Wang has also been removed from his official post.”
The bigger question is whether the crackdown was successful. Not exactly, according to many who have suggested that it may have resulted in exactly the opposite intended result due to the intense media coverage. After all, “What is the best way to stop ‘rumors’?, Zhang Xin, one of China’s most prominent real estate developers, asked the 3-million-plus followers of her Sina blog. It is transparency and openness. The more you don’t allow speech, the more rumors there will be.”
As is seen in Du v. Cisco, Cisco supports and profits from the Chinese Communist Party’s oppressive censorship of its citizens. If you have additional information regarding this ongoing support by Cisco, please do not hesitate to contact Daniel Ward. Any such communications will be kept confidential.
Let Cisco Systems know that their continued and knowing support of the Chinese Communist Party’s efforts to violate the human rights of peaceful political dissidents like Du Daobin, Zhou Yuanzhi, and Liu Xianbin will no longer be tolerated. Contact your elected representatives— let them know how you feel. Finally, if you haven’t already done so, sign the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s petition – Tell Cisco: Stop helping China abuse human rights!